Tag Archives: regular exercise

Exercise and the Ever-Smarter Human Brain

Anyone whose resolve to exercise in 2013 is a bit shaky might want to consider an emerging scientific view of human evolution. It suggests that we are clever today in part because a million years ago, we could outrun and outwalk most other mammals over long distances. Our brains were shaped and sharpened by movement, the idea goes, and we continue to require regular physical activity in order for our brains to function optimally.

The role of physical endurance in shaping humankind has intrigued anthropologists and gripped the popular imagination for some time. In 2004, the evolutionary biologists Daniel E. Lieberman of Harvard and Dennis M. Bramble of the University of Utah published a seminal article in the journal Nature titled “Endurance Running and the Evolution of Homo,” in which they posited that our bipedal ancestors survived by becoming endurance athletes, able to bring down swifter prey through sheer doggedness, jogging and plodding along behind them until the animals dropped.

Endurance produced meals, which provided energy for mating, which meant that adept early joggers passed along their genes. In this way, natural selection drove early humans to become even more athletic, Dr. Lieberman and other scientists have written, their bodies developing longer legs, shorter toes, less hair and complicated inner-ear mechanisms to maintain balance and stability during upright ambulation. Movement shaped the human body.

But simultaneously, in a development that until recently many scientists viewed as unrelated, humans were becoming smarter. Their brains were increasing rapidly in size.

Today, humans have a brain that is about three times the size that would be expected, anthropologists say, given our species’ body size in comparison with that of other mammals.

To explain those outsized brains, evolutionary scientists have pointed to such occurrences as meat eating and, perhaps most determinatively, our early ancestors’ need for social interaction. Early humans had to plan and execute hunts as a group, which required complicated thinking patterns and, it’s been thought, rewarded the social and brainy with evolutionary success. According to that hypothesis, the evolution of the brain was driven by the need to think.

But now some scientists are suggesting that physical activity also played a critical role in making our brains larger.

To reach that conclusion, anthropologists began by looking at existing data about brain size and endurance capacity in a variety of mammals, including dogs, guinea pigs, foxes, mice, wolves, rats, civet cats, antelope, mongooses, goats, sheep and elands. They found a notable pattern. Species like dogs and rats that had a high innate endurance capacity, which presumably had evolved over millenniums, also had large brain volumes relative to their body size.

The researchers also looked at recent experiments in which mice and rats were systematically bred to be marathon runners. Lab animals that willingly put in the most miles on running wheels were interbred, resulting in the creation of a line of lab animals that excelled at running.

Interestingly, after multiple generations, these animals began to develop innately high levels of substances that promote tissue growth and health, including a protein called brain-derived neurotrophic factor, or BDNF. These substances are important for endurance performance. They also are known to drive brain growth.

What all of this means, says David A. Raichlen, an anthropologist at the University of Arizona and an author of a new article about the evolution of human brains appearing in the January issue of Proceedings of the Royal Society B, is that physical activity may have helped to make early humans smarter.

“We think that what happened” in our early hunter-gatherer ancestors, he says, is that the more athletic and active survived and, as with the lab mice, passed along physiological characteristics that improved their endurance, including elevated levels of BDNF. Eventually, these early athletes had enough BDNF coursing through their bodies that some could migrate from the muscles to the brain, where it nudged the growth of brain tissue.

Those particular early humans then applied their growing ability to think and reason toward better tracking prey, becoming the best-fed and most successful from an evolutionary standpoint. Being in motion made them smarter, and being smarter now allowed them to move more efficiently.

And out of all of this came, eventually, an ability to understand higher math and invent iPads. But that was some time later.

The broad point of this new notion is that if physical activity helped to mold the structure of our brains, then it most likely remains essential to brain health today, says John D. Polk, an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and co-author, with Dr. Raichlen, of the new article.

And there is scientific support for that idea. Recent studies have shown, he says, that “regular exercise, even walking,” leads to more robust mental abilities, “beginning in childhood and continuing into old age.”

Of course, the hypothesis that jogging after prey helped to drive human brain evolution is just a hypothesis, Dr. Raichlen says, and almost unprovable.

But it is compelling, says Harvard’s Dr. Lieberman, who has worked with the authors of the new article. “I fundamentally agree that there is a deep evolutionary basis for the relationship between a healthy body and a healthy mind,” he says, a relationship that makes the term “jogging your memory” more literal than most of us might have expected and provides a powerful incentive to be active in 2013.

Biggest Loser Diet

Overview

Type:

Balanced.

Resembles these U.S. News-rated diets:

DASH Diet, Mayo Clinic Diet, Mediterranean Diet, Volumetrics, Glycemic-Index Diet

The aim:

Weight loss, disease prevention or reversal.

The claim:

Six weeks of healthy food and regular exercise not only is a great start to a weight-loss journey—it can also help prevent or reverse diabetes; cut the risk for cancer, dementia, and Alzheimer’s; improve your heart health; and boost your immune system.

The theory:

We eat too many of the wrong foods and not enough of the right ones, and we sit around too much. The not-so-surprising solution: eat regular meals that emphasize filling calories from fruits, vegetables, lean protein sources, and whole grains; practice portion control; use a food journal; and get up off the sofa.

How does the Biggest Loser Diet work?

First you have to choose a Biggest Loser book to follow. They’re all based on the same principles. What’s your appetite for reading? There’s the short-and-sweet 2005 edition, the more bulky 30-Day Jump Start from 2009, and, midway between the two, 2010’s 6 Weeks to a Healthier You. All are heavy on success stories from past contestants of the Biggest Loser reality TV show, tips for developing your menu based on a special food pyramid, and suggestions for sweating out some calories. Expand this section for more on the most recent version.

Will you lose weight?

It’s likely you will, given the plan’s two foolproof dieting tactics—calorie restriction and exercise. You just have to make sure you stick with it. Expand this section for research on the diet.

Does it have cardiovascular benefits?

Almost certainly. Some data show that obese and morbidly obese Biggest Loser contestants lowered their “bad” LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, and triglycerides, a fatty substance that in excess has been linked to heart disease, and increased their “good” HDL cholesterol.

While your experience on the diet won’t exactly mirror that of the contestants—and if you have less weight to lose, your results may be less dramatic—the Biggest Loser approach reflects the current consensus of the medical community about what makes a heart-healthy plan. It’s heavy on fruits, vegetables, lean protein, and whole grains while light on saturated fat and added sugar. And exercise is an integral part of the program, not an add-on.

Can it prevent or control diabetes?

The approach is generally viewed as an ideal eating pattern for both.

Are there health risks?

Not likely.

How well does it conform to accepted dietary guidelines?

Fat. At 25 percent of your day’s calories, it’s at the low end of the government’s recommendation that between 20 and 35 percent come from fat. It’s also very low in saturated fat at 5 percent of daily calories; the government’s cap is 10 percent.

Protein. Within the recommendation at 30 percent of daily calories.

Carbohydrates. At a middle-of-the-road 50 percent of daily calories, it’s within the acceptable recommended range.

Salt. The majority of Americans eat too much salt. The recommended daily maximum is 2,300 milligrams, but if you’re 51 or older, African-American, or have hypertension, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease, that limit is 1,500 mg. This diet clocked in at 2,900 mg., slightly above the targeted top number.

Other key nutrients. The 2010 Dietary Guidelines call these “nutrients of concern” because many Americans get too little of one or more of them:

  • Fiber. Getting the recommended daily amount of 22 to 34 grams for adults helps you feel full and promotes good digestion. At 31 grams a day on this diet, you’ll meet or come close to your fiber goal.
  • Potassium. A sufficient amount of this important nutrient, according to the 2010 Dietary Guidelines, counters salt’s ability to raise blood pressure, decreases bone loss, and reduces the risk of developing kidney stones. It’s not that easy to get the recommended daily 4,700 mg. from food. (Bananas are high in potassium, yet you’d have to eat 11 a day to get enough.) The majority of Americans take in far too little. The sample menu provided about 3,500 mg. While a little short of the goal, it’s likely more than many Americans get.
  • Calcium. It’s essential not only to build and maintain bones but to make blood vessels and muscles function properly. Many Americans don’t get enough. Women and anyone older than 50 should try especially hard to meet the government’s recommendation of 1,000 to 1,300 mg. a day. You’ll be in the ballpark on this diet.
  • Vitamin B-12. Adults should shoot for a daily 2.4 micrograms of this nutrient, which is critical for proper cell metabolism. The sample menu provided more than double the recommendation.
  • Vitamin D. Adults who don’t get enough sunlight need to meet the government’s recommended 15 micrograms a day with food or a supplement to lower the risk of bone fractures. A sample menu was just short of the goal, but low-fat dairy and fortified cereals will help you meet the requirement.

Supplements recommended? No, but a Biggest Loser representative says dieters who worry about falling short—perhaps they don’t eat much fish, or dislike dairy and other calcium sources, for instance—might consider supplementing with a multivitamin, calcium, vitamin D, or omega-3 from fish oil.

How easy is it to follow?

Because the Biggest Loser diet doesn’t ban entire food groups, you shouldn’t have trouble complying long-term.

Convenience:

Recipes, convenience foods, and online resources abound. Eating out and drinking alcohol are both OK—be cautious and shrewd and you’ll be fine.

Read More

Fullness:

Nutrition experts emphasize the importance of satiety, the satisfied feeling that you’ve had enough. Since a fiber- or protein-packed meal or snack comes every few hours, you should keep hunger pangs at bay.

Taste:

You’re making everything, so if something doesn’t taste good, you know who to blame.

How much does it cost?

Fresh fruits, veggies, whole grains, and fish are generally more expensive than a cart full of sugary cereal, white bread, and sweets. But you’re not paying a membership fee, and you can tweak the suggested meal plans to bring the tab down—buy whatever produce is on sale that day at the grocery store, for example.

What is the role of exercise?

If you’re following 6 Weeks to a Healthier You, each week drills home the importance of exercise in combating and reversing common weight-related conditions, from type 2 diabetes to high blood pressure and heart disease. You’ll start out with body-weight training (lunges, squats, push-ups), then eventually move into aerobics, strength and resistance training, and even yoga and pilates. What matters most, though, is that you’re moving. Adults are generally encouraged to get at least 2½ hours of moderate-intensity activity (like brisk walking) a week, along with a couple days of muscle-strengthening activities.